NYT Interviews Zardari; Hilarity Ensues
The Pakistan President displays some of his formidable intellect in this long piece by James Traub.
We get Zardari the constitutionalist, who seems to believe that just because the constitution allows a certain measure to be taken, it is contingent upon him to take it:
"No democratic party would like to do governor's rule," he said. "It's in the Constitution; it's part of necessity."
Then we have Zardari the blatant liar, who feels it isn't enough that he was married to Benazir.
"Benazir and myself are related."
Or maybe he thinks marrying some makes you their relation. He obviously doesn't know much about marriages, believing them not to be governed by law. Here's how he describes his agreement with Nawaz Sharif:
"an agreement by consent," not "an agreement by law." It was like a marriage. It was like a merger.
How about Zardari the mangler of the English language?
“I will not comment on those things,” he said gravely, “because Islam forbids drinking.” What’s more, he added, with a show of indignation, “this description you give — who is fun-loving, who is easygoing, who is consumption of Scotching and wining and dining and dancing — why would that kind of man opt for a life that he knows for sure that he will have to go through a lot of trouble and tribulation?
Then we also get a demonstration of the contradictary nature of Zardari:
"The world philosophers," he asserted, "have come to the conclusion that aid has never been one of the best ways of developing countries." But then he scrambled his talking points and said that when he first spoke with Bush administration officials, he called for a "Marshall Plan" for Pakistan.
And my personal favourite: Zardari the philosopher king:
"Every day," he said, "man is growing and learning. What you were yesterday, you are probably not today, because today's you is yesterday's experience. One is always learning."
10 comments:
The picture at the top of the article is priceless.
If you have seen the picture at the top, you should know what's coming your way. I think he now spends more time with his wife's photos than he ever did with her when she was alive.
Hahahaha. Thanks for posting this Bubs. Philosopher king indeed.
The Presidency really has transformed him, he's now more willing to speak for extended period of times, is peppering his speeches with 'big words' (that make no sense in the context in which they are being said), and his accent has changed drastically (it's as though he's traveled to 19th century Eton and picked up their pronunciation of Subcontinental places - our army officers suffer from the same illness).
word AZ, word!
love his last line, guy's a bloody inspiration.
(insert: ha ha ha!!)
the comment about AZ spending more time with BB's photos than her is spot on.
On this last quote, you don't think he's just been reading alot of Heraclitus? "You could not step twice into the same river; for other waters are ever flowing on to you." No? =)
Negeen:
Read? You must be joking. The only thing AZ is adept at reading is his bank statements.
It is pathetic how we find joy in ridiculing our own at such times of utter distress. I’m usually impressed with the articles by this author because of their sobriety and rationale. This was a sore disappointment. I expected a more mature response in the face of such an article because as is obvious that media outlets like NYT, Washington Post, etc are working under an agenda. They are tossing out reports on Pakistan’s intelligence agencies, sensationalizing Pakistan so that new drone targets are drawn up, etc. it’s just part of an international news setting agenda. And the tragic part is that though we may agree with them in the analysis, now is not the time to join them to gloat at our own. no matter how bad. Because right now, Pakistan needs us.
It is pathetic how we find joy in ridiculing our own at such times of utter distress. I’m usually impressed with the articles by this author because of their sobriety and rationale. This was a sore disappointment. I expected a more mature response in the face of such an article because as is obvious that media outlets like NYT, Washington Post, etc are working under an agenda. They are tossing out reports on Pakistan’s intelligence agencies, sensationalizing Pakistan so that new drone targets are drawn up, etc. it’s just part of an international news setting agenda. And the tragic part is that though we may agree with them in the analysis, now is not the time to join them to gloat at our own. no matter how bad. Because right now, Pakistan needs us.
I wonder what Zardari's advisors would be telling him regarding his popularity as a leader inside as well as outside the country which definitely is declining sharply - Foreign Policy Magazine has already listed our dear accidental president at No. 5 in its World Biggest Losers List. How he is gonna deal with the current Pakistan which as described on New York Times Magazine is ' PERILOUS, ANARCHIC, BROKE, VIOLENT,SPLINTERING, CORRUPT, ARMED
GOVERNABLE?
Post a Comment